Bailey, C J & Card, K A. (2009)
Effective Pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced
instructors, Internet and Higher
Education, 12, (152-155.)
I am
currently researching effective pedagogical practices for online teachers. Providing instructors with technological
training has become more important as universities, schools and organizations
cater for distance and/or self-paced learners.
Many who teach online say they lack pedagogical and instructional
support (Morris & Finnegan, 2008-2009).
A research
project involving 15 award-winning e-Learning instructors was undertaken
through the Western Dakota Technical Institute and the School of Education,
University of South Dakota . The purpose
of the study was to find out what, experienced online instructors perceive to
be ‘ effective pedagogical practices.’ (p. 152)
Three teaching theories were used as a framework for the
inquiry: andragogy, constructivism and transformational learning.
Andragogy is described (Knowles,
1992) as self-directed learning which consists of a set of four key
competencies:
·
“skill
in diagnosis of learning needs,
·
formulation
of learning goals,
·
identification
of human and material resources for learning,
and
·
evaluation
of learning outcomes.”
The second part of the theoretical framework is constructivism:
this theory encourages students to be open to new learning perspectives and
experiences and to actively explore topics and subjects that interested them personally.
(Conway, 2003) (Underhill, 2006) asserts
that Constructivism (particularly socio-Constructivism) forms the basis of
teaching and learning developments in online learning. (p 165)
Transformative learning is the third pedagogical theory
employed in the programme. This theory encapsulates
‘the capacity for critical thinking and evaluating basic assumptions and
meaning-making frameworks.’ (p 165) The theory promotes strong intellectual
relationships to evolve between teacher/student and student/student. Teachers tune in to learners’ thinking
through ‘online asynchronous discussions’ which enable students time to reflect
on research findings. (Baglione & Nastanski,
2007)
(Chickering &
Gamson, 1987) identified
seven effective pedagogical practices as a result of combined studies on the
subject. These are:
1. “Encourage contacts between students
and faculty in and out of classes.
2. Learning is enhanced when it is more
like a team effort than a solo race.
3. Active learning is encouraged in
classes that use structured exercises, challenging discussions, team projects,
and peer critiques.
4. Students need appropriate and timely
feedback on their performance to benefit from courses.
5. Learning to use one’s time well is
critical for students and professionals alike.
6. Communicate higher expectations.
7. Provide a diverse delivery system. “
Effective
online instructors employ ‘a different set of practices than classical
classroom tuition. (p. 153) Professor Alison King, California State
University, put it succinctly when she coined the phrase: ‘from sage on the
stage to guide on the side’ (King 1993). Part of an instructors’ brief is to
encourage collaboration among students so that they can construct meaning and
have the opportunity to reflect on course content.
Morris and
Finnegan (2008-2009) referred to four roles experienced online facilitators
employ to enhance effective learning. These
include:
·
“A
social role
·
A
pedagogical role
·
A
management role; and
·
A
technological role.”
Best
practices that resulted from the interviews in the Dakota
project included:
·
“Fostering
relationships with students;
·
Engagement
- between teacher/students and students/students;
·
Timeliness
– maintaining efficient feedback and advice;
·
Communication:
a key issue which differed widely from face-to-face dialogue;
·
Organization:
for both students and teachers;
·
Technology:
developing technical competence/expertise;
·
Flexibility
– keeping an open mind and having the ability to adapt;
·
High
expectations: maintaining communication with students, defining course goals
and learning objectives.”
Some negative
effects for online teachers were recorded and included ‘a high degree of
depersonalization and low sense of personal accomplishment’ (Hogan & McKnight, 2007). There was also the perception that teaching
online took more time than traditional classroom teaching. Later comparative
analysis, however, showed there was no time difference. (p. 153)
Also online
instructors considered teachers’ time more fragmented in nature and spread over
days rather than classroom tuition which was contained within the framework of
a single lesson. (Hislop & Ellis, 2004).
Summary
Considering
the evidence above, and confronted with an ever increasing variety of
technological options, training for online instructors is a priority and would make
a significant shift towards the development and design of increasingly more effective (and less stressful)
pedagogical practices.
Hi Barbara
ReplyDeleteI think this has fewer referencing issues but still some persist. Is the aim of this blog a summary of the first sections of the Bailey and Card article?
I think it is important to be clear about what is a direct quote and what is a secondary citation. If you did not go to the original source of e.g. Knowles then you need to cite Knowles as a secondary source. Please go to APA 6th for information on this. Also you quote Bailey and Card and not Morris and Finnegan in your first paragraph and this needs to be in speech marks and page reference given.
I agree that this is a good article and well worth reading in some depth.
Hope this feedback helps you.