Thursday, 29 March 2012

Providing online instructors with tuition in more effective pedagogical practices


Bailey, C J & Card, K A. (2009) Effective Pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors, Internet and Higher Education, 12, (152-155.)



I am currently researching effective pedagogical practices for online teachers.  Providing instructors with technological training has become more important as universities, schools and organizations cater for distance and/or self-paced learners.  Many who teach online say they lack pedagogical and instructional support (Morris & Finnegan, 2008-2009).

A research project involving 15 award-winning e-Learning instructors was undertaken through the Western Dakota Technical Institute and the School of Education, University of South Dakota .  The purpose of the study was to find out what, experienced online instructors perceive to be ‘ effective pedagogical practices.’ (p. 152)
Three teaching theories were used as a framework for the inquiry: andragogy, constructivism and transformational learning.  
Andragogy is described (Knowles, 1992) as self-directed learning which consists of a set of four key competencies:
·         “skill in diagnosis of learning needs,
·         formulation of learning goals,
·         identification of human and material resources for learning,  and
·         evaluation of learning outcomes.” 
The second part of the theoretical framework is constructivism: this theory encourages students to be open to new learning perspectives and experiences and to actively explore topics and subjects that interested them personally. (Conway, 2003) (Underhill, 2006) asserts that Constructivism (particularly socio-Constructivism) forms the basis of teaching and learning developments in online learning.  (p 165)
Transformative learning is the third pedagogical theory employed in the programme.  This theory encapsulates ‘the capacity for critical thinking and evaluating basic assumptions and meaning-making frameworks.’  (p 165)  The theory promotes strong intellectual relationships to evolve between teacher/student and student/student.  Teachers tune in to learners’ thinking through ‘online asynchronous discussions’ which enable students time to reflect on research findings. (Baglione & Nastanski, 2007)
(Chickering & Gamson, 1987) identified seven effective pedagogical practices as a result of combined studies on the subject.  These are:

1.      “Encourage contacts between students and faculty in and out of classes.
2.      Learning is enhanced when it is more like a team effort than a solo race.
3.      Active learning is encouraged in classes that use structured exercises, challenging discussions, team projects, and peer critiques.
4.      Students need appropriate and timely feedback on their performance to benefit from courses.
5.      Learning to use one’s time well is critical for students and professionals alike.
6.      Communicate higher expectations.
7.      Provide a diverse delivery system. “

Effective online instructors employ ‘a different set of practices than classical classroom tuition.  (p. 153)  Professor Alison King, California State University, put it succinctly when she coined the phrase: ‘from sage on the stage to guide on the side’ (King 1993). Part of an instructors’ brief is to encourage collaboration among students so that they can construct meaning and have the opportunity to reflect on course content.
Morris and Finnegan (2008-2009) referred to four roles experienced online facilitators employ to enhance effective learning.  These include: 

·         “A social role
·         A pedagogical role
·         A management role; and
·         A technological role.”

Best practices that resulted from the interviews in the Dakota project included: 

·         “Fostering relationships with students;
·         Engagement - between teacher/students and students/students;
·         Timeliness – maintaining efficient feedback and advice;
·         Communication: a key issue which differed widely from face-to-face dialogue;
·         Organization: for both students and teachers;
·         Technology: developing technical competence/expertise;
·         Flexibility – keeping an open mind and having the ability to adapt;
·         High expectations: maintaining communication with students, defining course goals and learning objectives.”

Some negative effects for online teachers were recorded and included ‘a high degree of depersonalization and low sense of personal accomplishment’ (Hogan & McKnight, 2007).  There was also the perception that teaching online took more time than traditional classroom teaching. Later comparative analysis, however, showed there was no time difference. (p. 153)
Also online instructors considered teachers’ time more fragmented in nature and spread over days rather than classroom tuition which was contained within the framework of a single lesson. (Hislop & Ellis, 2004)

Summary

Considering the evidence above, and confronted with an ever increasing variety of technological options, training for online instructors is a priority and would make a significant shift towards the development and design of increasingly more effective (and less stressful) pedagogical practices.









1 comment:

  1. Hi Barbara
    I think this has fewer referencing issues but still some persist. Is the aim of this blog a summary of the first sections of the Bailey and Card article?

    I think it is important to be clear about what is a direct quote and what is a secondary citation. If you did not go to the original source of e.g. Knowles then you need to cite Knowles as a secondary source. Please go to APA 6th for information on this. Also you quote Bailey and Card and not Morris and Finnegan in your first paragraph and this needs to be in speech marks and page reference given.
    I agree that this is a good article and well worth reading in some depth.
    Hope this feedback helps you.

    ReplyDelete